Ingram v. Henderson
Ingram v. Henderson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1200
JUDY M. INGRAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM J. HENDERSON, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Elizabeth V. Hallanan, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-108-2)
Submitted: August 29, 2000 Decided: September 11, 2000
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Theodore R. Dues, Jr., THEODORE R. DUES, JR., L.C., Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, Michael L. Keller, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia; Thomas J. Marshall, Acting Managing Counsel, Legal Policy, Steven F. Hirsch, UNITED STATES POSTAL SER- VICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Judy M. Ingram appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to Defendant in this action alleging employment
discrimination. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Ingram v.
Henderson, No. CA-99-108-2 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 24, 2000). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished