Ingram v. Henderson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Ingram v. Henderson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1200

JUDY M. INGRAM,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM J. HENDERSON, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Elizabeth V. Hallanan, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-108-2)

Submitted: August 29, 2000 Decided: September 11, 2000

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Theodore R. Dues, Jr., THEODORE R. DUES, JR., L.C., Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, Michael L. Keller, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia; Thomas J. Marshall, Acting Managing Counsel, Legal Policy, Steven F. Hirsch, UNITED STATES POSTAL SER- VICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Judy M. Ingram appeals the district court’s order granting

summary judgment to Defendant in this action alleging employment

discrimination. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Ingram v.

Henderson, No. CA-99-108-2 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 24, 2000). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished