Drinkard v. Baskerville

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Drinkard v. Baskerville

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6704

ROBERT D. DRINKARD, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ALTON BASKERVILLE, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-852-7)

Submitted: August 29, 2000 Decided: September 11, 2000

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert D. Drinkard, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Donald Eldridge Jeffrey III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Vir- ginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Robert D. Drinkard, Jr. seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the dis-

trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal sub-

stantially on the reasoning of the district court.* See Drinkard

v. Baskerville, No. CA-99-852-7 (W.D. Va. Apr. 27, 2000). We dis-

pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

* Drinkard alleges that the district court should have ex- cluded two periods from its statute of limitations calculations. We hold that, even with the benefit of those periods, Drinkard’s petition was time-barred under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2244

(d) (West Supp. 2000).

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished