Miller v. Orangeburg School Dist 5

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Miller v. Orangeburg School Dist 5

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2454

KEITH MILLER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ORANGEBURG, SOUTH CAROLINA CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT FIVE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-98-1111-5-06BD)

Submitted: May 23, 2000 Decided: September 21, 2000

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Laura P. Valtorta, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Andrea E. White, Thomas K. Barlow, DUFF, DUBBERLY, TURNER, WHITE & BOYKIN, L.L.C., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Keith Miller appeals the district court's order granting the

Defendant's motion for summary judgment in his racial discrimina-

tion employment action. We have reviewed the record and the dis-

trict court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Miller v.

Orangeburg South Carolina Consol. Sch. Dist. Five, No. CA-98-1111-

5-06BD (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 1999). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished