Fordham v. NC Department Corr
Fordham v. NC Department Corr
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-7720
CHRISTOPHER JAMES FORDHAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; MACK JARVIS; FRANKLIN FREEMAN; LYNN C. PHILLIPS; RANDALL LEE; RICHARD T. DUKE, JR.; RICKY ROBINSON; MR. MCWILLIAMS; SERGEANT WIGGINS; SERGEANT DELOATCH; W. SLEDGE, SR.; OFFICER DILLARD; OFFICER ROWE; OFFICER PRIMUS; OFFICER MITCHELL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief Dis- trict Judge. (CA-98-789-5-BO)
Submitted: August 31, 2000 Decided: September 21, 2000
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher James Fordham, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Ray Garvey, OF- FICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Christopher James Fordham appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his
42 U.S.C.A. § 1983(West Supp. 2000) com-
plaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Fordham v. North Carolina
Dep’t of Corr., No. CA-98-789-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 16, 1999).
Fordham’s request for injunctive relief is denied. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade-
quately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished