U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Tangires v. Johns Hopkins Hosp

Tangires v. Johns Hopkins Hosp
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 20, 2000

Tangires v. Johns Hopkins Hosp

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1182

DIMITRA TANGIRES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

THE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-4181-H)

Submitted: July 31, 2000 Decided: September 20, 2000

Before MURNAGHAN* and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dimitra Tangires, Appellant Pro Se. Neal Serotte, Elizabeth Gross Jacobs, SEROTTE, ROCKMAN & WESCOTT, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

* Judge Murnaghan was assigned to the panel in this case but died prior to the time the decision was filed. The decision is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Dimitra Tangires appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Johns Hopkins Hospital on her complaint filed under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C.A.

§§ 12101-12213 (West 1995 & Supp. 2000) and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 701-797 (West 1999 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See Tangires v. Johns Hopkins Hosp., No. CA-98-4181-H (D. Md. Jan. 10, 2000). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.