United States v. Swan

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit September 18, 2000

Opinion

No. 00-6818

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CR-95-365)

Submitted: September 8, 2000 Decided: September 18, 2000

Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur Oscar Swan, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Arthur Oscar Swan appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion to compel the Government to comply with the terms of the

plea agreement by filing a Fed. R. Crim. P. 35 motion. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See United States v. Swan, No. CR-95-365 (D.S.C.

May 16, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.