Smith v. Johnson
Smith v. Johnson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6730
WILLIAM R. SMITH,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
PHOEBE JOHNSON, Warden; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-00-922-3-18)
Submitted: September 8, 2000 Decided: September 18, 2000
Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William R. Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
William R. Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying relief on his petition filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West
1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-
tificate of appealability and Smith’s motion for judicial notice
and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See
Smith v. Johnson, No. CA-00-922-3-18 (D.S.C. May 5, 2000). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished