Koenig v. Curran
Koenig v. Curran
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6298
BRUCE WAYNE KOENIG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
J. JOSEPH CURRAN, JR., Attorney General of Maryland,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-36-JFM)
Submitted: May 10, 2000 Decided: September 18, 2000
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bruce Wayne Koenig, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Bruce Wayne Koenig appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his
42 U.S.C.A. § 1983(West Supp. 1999) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Koenig v. Curran, No. CA-00-36-JFM (D. Md.
Jan. 10 and 28, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished