Koenig v. Curran

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Koenig v. Curran

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6298

BRUCE WAYNE KOENIG,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

J. JOSEPH CURRAN, JR., Attorney General of Maryland,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-36-JFM)

Submitted: May 10, 2000 Decided: September 18, 2000

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce Wayne Koenig, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Bruce Wayne Koenig appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West Supp. 1999) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See Koenig v. Curran, No. CA-00-36-JFM (D. Md.

Jan. 10 and 28, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished