Billups v. Southern Appalachian Coal
Billups v. Southern Appalachian Coal
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1289
CLAYTON BILLUPS, Petitioner, versus
SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN COAL COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (99-415-BLA, 99-415-BLA-A)
Submitted: August 29, 2000 Decided: September 18, 2000
Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John H. Skaggs, D. Christopher Hedges, LAW OFFICES OF STUART CALWELL, Charleston, West Virginia, for Petitioner. David L.
Yaussy, ROBINSON & MCELWEE, Charleston, West Virginia, Henry L.
Solano, Solicitor of Labor, Donald S. Shire, Associate Solicitor, Patricia M. Nece, Edward Waldman, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Clayton Billups seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1999). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the rea- soning of the Board.* See Billups v. Southern Appalachian Coal Co., BRB 99-0415-BLA & 99-0415-BLA-A (B.R.B. Jan. 14, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* We have considered the impact of our recent decision in Island Creek Coal Co. v. Compton, 211 F.3d 203 (4th Cir. 2000), and find it does not alter the outcome of this case.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.