Venable v. True
Venable v. True
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6841
JAMES EUGENE VENABLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PAGE TRUE, Warden; RON ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; ANDREW WINSTON, Chairman; GENE JOHNSON, Director; M. VERNON SMITH, M.D., Chief Physician; Y. ELSWICK, Warden; JOHN DOE, Owner of CMS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-346-7)
Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 29, 2000
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Eugene Venable, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
James Eugene Venable appeals the district court’s order de-
nying relief on his
42 U.S.C.A. § 1983(West Supp. 2000) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See Venable v. True, No. CA-00-346-7 (W.D.
Va. May 23, 2000).* We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on May 22, 2000, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on May 23, 2000. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray
806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35(4th Cir. 1986).
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished