United States v. Matata
United States v. Matata
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6641
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CHUNGA HAKI MATATA, a/k/a K-9,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Shelby. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CR-94-44, CA-00-77-1-3)
Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 29, 2000
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chunga Haki Matata, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Chunga Haki Matata appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion for disclosure of grand jury materials. We have re-
viewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See United States v. Matata, Nos. CR-94-44; CA-00-
77-1-3 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 14, 2000). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished