Cadejuste v. Kaloroumakis

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Cadejuste v. Kaloroumakis

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7040

DIEUNIOUS CADEJUSTE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GEORGE KALOROUMAKIS; JOSEPH CURRAN, The At- torney General of the State of Maryland,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-2299-H)

Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 29, 2000

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dieunious Cadejuste, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, Jason Trumpbour, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Dieunious Cadejuste seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion construed as a Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for

reconsideration based on newly discovered evidence. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeal based on the reasoning of the dis-

trict court. See Cadejuste v. Kaloroumakis, No. CA-99-2299-H (D.

Md. July 10, 2000). We further deny Cadejuste’s motion for the

appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished