Belle v. Commissioner of Corr

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Belle v. Commissioner of Corr

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6981

BRYANT KEITH BELLE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION; MARYLAND STATE POLICE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-99-3621-WMN)

Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 29, 2000

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bryant Keith Belle, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GEN- ERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Bryant Keith Belle appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West Supp. 2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See Belle v. Commissioner of Correction, No.

CA-99-3621-WMN (D. Md. June 28, 2000). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished