United States v. Porter

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Porter

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6661

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LORENZA PORTER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CR-95-80, CA-98-234-3)

Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 28, 2000

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lorenza Porter, Appellant Pro Se. David T. Maguire, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Lorenza Porter seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West Supp. 2000) motion. We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See

United States v. Porter, Nos. CR-95-80; CA-98-234-3 (E.D. Va. Apr.

28, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished