UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6421

HERMAN GREEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

EMSA CORRECTIONAL CARE, INCORPORATED; RESIDENT AGENT; WAYNE BERRY, MD, Administrator; D. HOOD, Nurse Administrator; JOHN MOSS, P.A.; K. DOUGLAS, R.N.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA- 99-1269-DKC)

Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 28, 2000

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Herman Green, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Joseph Crawford, GODARD, WEST & ADELMAN, P.C., Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Herman Green appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his

(West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Green v. EMSA Correctional Care, Inc., No. CA-

99-1269-DKC (D. Md. Feb. 17, 2000).* We dispense with oral argu-

ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre-

sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on February 16, 2000, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on February 17, 2000. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray,

(4th Cir. 1986).

2