Simpson v. Simpkins

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Simpson v. Simpkins

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1584

LIZZIE LOU SIMPSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

OFFICER SHERRI SIMPKINS; CLINTON POLICE DE- PARTMENT; CITY OF CLINTON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-99-3356-6-13AK)

Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 27, 2000

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lizzie Lou Simpson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Lizzie Lou Simpson appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on her

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West Supp. 2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting

and modifying the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Simpson v. Simpkins, No. CA-99-3356-6-13AK

(D.S.C. Apr. 7, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-

rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished