Simpson v. Simpkins
Simpson v. Simpkins
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1584
LIZZIE LOU SIMPSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
OFFICER SHERRI SIMPKINS; CLINTON POLICE DE- PARTMENT; CITY OF CLINTON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-99-3356-6-13AK)
Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 27, 2000
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lizzie Lou Simpson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Lizzie Lou Simpson appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on her
42 U.S.C.A. § 1983(West Supp. 2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting
and modifying the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Simpson v. Simpkins, No. CA-99-3356-6-13AK
(D.S.C. Apr. 7, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished