U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Perryman v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc

Perryman v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 27, 2000

Perryman v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1828

LAMONICA PERRYMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

WAL-MART STORES, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Tommy E. Miller, Magistrate Judge. (CA-99-1417-2)

Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 27, 2000

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lamonica Perryman, Appellant Pro Se. David Edward Constine, III, Daryl Eugene Webb, Jr., Richard Franklin Hawkins, MAYS & VALENTINE, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Lamonica Perryman appeals the magistrate judge’s order grant- ing summary judgment in favor of Wal-Mart and dismissing this civil rights action alleging racial discrimination in employment in vio- lation of Title VII. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f) (1994). We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s order and find no reversible error. The magistrate judge correctly determined that Perryman failed to establish the elements of a prima facie case of employment discrimination. See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 793 (1973). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.