U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Finch v. Smithfield Packing

Finch v. Smithfield Packing
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 27, 2000

Finch v. Smithfield Packing

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1365

MARVIN L. FINCH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

SMITHFIELD PACKING COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-10-5-BR)

Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 27, 2000

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marvin L. Finch, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen W. Ewalt, MAUPIN, TAYLOR & ELLIS, P.A., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Marvin L. Finch appeals the district court’s order granting Smithfield’s motion for summary judgment on his employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Finch v. Smithfield Packing Company, Inc., No. CA-99-10-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Feb.

11, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.