Bourger v. Eaton Corporation
Bourger v. Eaton Corporation
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1592
ROSA MCLEAN BOURGER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
EATON CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CA-98-266-1-T)
Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 27, 2000
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rosa McLean Bourger, Appellant Pro Se. John James Doyle, Jr., Jill Stricklin Cox, CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Rosa McLean Bourger appeals the district court’s order grant-
ing summary judgment to Defendant in her employment discrimination
suit. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Bourger v. Eaton Corp., No. CA-98-266-1-T
(W.D.N.C. Apr. 7, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished