Bourger v. Eaton Corporation

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Bourger v. Eaton Corporation

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1592

ROSA MCLEAN BOURGER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

EATON CORPORATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CA-98-266-1-T)

Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 27, 2000

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rosa McLean Bourger, Appellant Pro Se. John James Doyle, Jr., Jill Stricklin Cox, CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Rosa McLean Bourger appeals the district court’s order grant-

ing summary judgment to Defendant in her employment discrimination

suit. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Bourger v. Eaton Corp., No. CA-98-266-1-T

(W.D.N.C. Apr. 7, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished