U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

United States v. Skelton

United States v. Skelton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 26, 2000

United States v. Skelton

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7371

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

JAMES DONNIE SKELTON, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CR-95-834, CA-98-3522-8-13)

Submitted: August 31, 2000 Decided: September 26, 2000

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Keller Leonard, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appel- lant. Arthur Bradley Parham, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: James Donnie Skelton seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif- icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Skelton, Nos. CR-95-834; CA-98-3522-8-13 (D.S.C. Aug. 12, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.