Ekgh-Njoku v. INS
Ekgh-Njoku v. INS
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1412
VICTORIA EKGH-NJOKU,
Petitioner,
versus
U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A24-876-363)
Submitted: September 8, 2000 Decided: September 26, 2000
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Allan Ebert, LAW OFFICES OF ALLAN EBERT, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. David W. Ogden, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Terri J. Scadron, Senior Litigation Counsel, John D. Williams, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Victoria Ekgh-Njoku seeks review of the Board of Immigration
Appeals’ (“Board”) decision and order denying her motion to reopen
to apply for adjustment of status under § 245(a) of the Immigration
and Nationality Act, codified at
8 U.S.C.A. § 1255(a) (West 1999).
Our review of the record discloses that the Board properly denied
Ekgh-Njoku’s motion to reopen and that this appeal is without
merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See
Ekgh-Njoku v. INS, No. A24-876-363 (B.I.A. Mar. 10, 2000). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished