U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

United States v. Lee

United States v. Lee
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 5, 2000

United States v. Lee

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6359

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

PAUL LEE, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-89-273, CA-99-94-5)

Submitted: July 20, 2000 Decided: October 5, 2000

Before LUTTIG and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Michael D. Stein, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Paul Lee appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recom- mendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Lee, Nos. CR-89-273; CA-99-94-5 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 28, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.