United States v. Fiorani

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Fiorani

Opinion

Filed: October 13, 2000

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6465 (CR-98-340-A)

United States of America,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

Rosario A. Fiorani, Jr.,

Defendant - Appellant.

O R D E R

The court amends its opinion filed September 28, 2000, as

follows:

On the cover sheet, section 3, line 3, and on page 2, line 7

-- the references to “CA-99-200" are deleted.

For the Court - By Direction

/s/ Patricia S. Connor Clerk UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6465

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ROSARIO A. FIORANI, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CR-98-340-A)

Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 28, 2000

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rosario A. Fiorani, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. G. David Hackney, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

2 PER CURIAM:

Rosario A. Fiorani, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order dismissing his motion filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West

Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Fiorani, No. CR-98-

340-A (E.D. Va. Mar. 29, 2000). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished