United States v. Fiorani
United States v. Fiorani
Opinion
Filed: October 13, 2000
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6465 (CR-98-340-A)
United States of America,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
Rosario A. Fiorani, Jr.,
Defendant - Appellant.
O R D E R
The court amends its opinion filed September 28, 2000, as
follows:
On the cover sheet, section 3, line 3, and on page 2, line 7
-- the references to “CA-99-200" are deleted.
For the Court - By Direction
/s/ Patricia S. Connor Clerk UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6465
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ROSARIO A. FIORANI, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CR-98-340-A)
Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 28, 2000
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rosario A. Fiorani, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. G. David Hackney, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
2 PER CURIAM:
Rosario A. Fiorani, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s
order dismissing his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West
Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-
tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
of the district court. See United States v. Fiorani, No. CR-98-
340-A (E.D. Va. Mar. 29, 2000). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished