Whiting v. Ski's Auto World
Whiting v. Ski's Auto World
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1896
ANTHONY N. WHITING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SKI’S AUTO WORLD PAINT AND BODY SHOP, INCOR- PORATED; WILLIAM W. WESLOWSKI, d/b/a Ski’s Auto World Paint and Body Shop,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-215-5-BO)
Submitted: September 26, 2000 Decided: October 12, 2000
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony N. Whiting, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Joyce Hall, Fayette- ville, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Anthony N. Whiting appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment in his former employer’s favor in this employment
discrimination action. We have reviewed the record, the district
court’s opinion, and Whiting’s informal appellate brief. Because
Whiting failed to challenge the bases for the district court’s
rulings, he has failed to preserve any issue for appellate review.
See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Moreover, Whiting’s claims of attorney
error provide no basis for relief. See Sanchez v. United States
Postal Serv.,
785 F.2d 1236, 1237(5th Cir. 1986) (holding that
there is no right to effective assistance of counsel in civil
cases). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Whiting v. Ski’s Auto World Paint & Body Shop, Inc.,
No. CA-98-215-5-BO (E.D.N.C. June 5, 2000). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished