Jones v. US Parole Comm

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Jones v. US Parole Comm

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6132

JOHN EDWARD JONES,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-98-730)

Submitted: September 29, 2000 Decided: October 12, 2000

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Edward Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Fenita Morris Shepard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

John Edward Jones appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his

28 U.S.C. § 2241

(1994) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recom-

mendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Jones v. United States Parole Comm’n, No. CA-98-730 (E.D.N.C. Dec.

1, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished