U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Chapman v. Danzig

Chapman v. Danzig
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 11, 2000

Chapman v. Danzig

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1348

ARETHA CHAPMAN; TERESA ELLIOT; HESTIA G.

PAPPAS; CAROLYN BOLLING; ZENA R. PARKER; JOYCE SHELTON; LISA C. GREGORY, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus

RICHARD DANZIG, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-99-1494-A)

Submitted: September 29, 2000 Decided: October 11, 2000

Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert L. Bell, C. Vaughn Adams, BELL & ADAMS, Washington, D.C., for Appellants. Arthur Erwin Peabody, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Plaintiffs appeal the dismissal of their suit alleging con- stitutional violations by the Equal Employment Opportunity Office of the Naval Sea Systems Command. We have reviewed the record and the district’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Chapman v. Danzig, No. CA-99-1494-A (E.D. Va. Feb. 24, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.