U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Boone v. Apfel, Commissioner

Boone v. Apfel, Commissioner
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 11, 2000

Boone v. Apfel, Commissioner

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1717

CHARLES H. BOONE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (CA-99-192)

Submitted: September 20, 2000 Decided: October 11, 2000

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles H. Boone, Appellant Pro Se. S. Douglas Murray, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; John Francis Corcoran, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Charles H. Boone appeals from the district court’s order granting the Commissioner of Social Security’s motion for summary judgment and affirming the denial of social security disability insurance benefits. We have thoroughly reviewed the administrative record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Boone v. Apfel, No. CA-99-192 (W.D. Va. May 23, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.