Wright v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Wright v. United States

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6814

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ELI WRIGHT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CR-96-104, CA-99-2529-7-13)

Submitted: October 12, 2000 Decided: October 20, 2000

Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eli Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Lee Ellis Berlinsky, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Eli Wright seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West Supp. 2000). We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See Wright v. United States, Nos. CR-96-104; CA-99-2529-7-

13 (D.S.C. May 18, 2000). We further deny Wright’s motion for the

appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished