United States v. Byrd

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Byrd

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7160

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

HENRY CLIFFORD BYRD, SR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge. (CR-83-52, CA-00-276-1)

Submitted: October 12, 2000 Decided: October 20, 2000

Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry Clifford Byrd, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin H. White, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Henry Clifford Byrd, Sr., appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West

Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. See United States v. Byrd, Nos. CR-83-52; CA-00-

276-1 (M.D.N.C. July 19, 2000). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished