Palacio v. Johnson
Palacio v. Johnson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6788
WILSON PALACIO,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
PHOEBE JOHNSON, Warden of Perry Correctional Institution; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney Gen- eral of the State of South Carolina,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-99-1461)
Submitted: October 12, 2000 Decided: October 20, 2000
Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wilson Palacio, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, William Edgar Salter, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Wilson Palacio appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his petition filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West 1994 &
Supp. 2000), and the district court’s order declining to reconsider
the denial of relief. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif-
icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of
the district court. See Palacio v. Johnson, No. CA-99-1461 (D.S.C.
Mar. 30 & May 5, 2000).* We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on March 29, 2000, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on March 30, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray,
806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35(4th Cir. 1986).
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished