Key v. Catoe
Key v. Catoe
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6191
ALONZO KEY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM D. CATOE, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General of South Carolina,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-99-1834-3-18-BC)
Submitted: October 12, 2000 Decided: October 20, 2000
Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alonzo Key, Appellant Pro Se. George Robert DeLoach, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Caro- lina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Alonzo Key seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying
relief on his petition filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West 1994 &
Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-
trict court. See Key v. Catoe, No. CA-99-1834-3-18-BC (D.S.C. Jan.
18, 2000).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on January 14, 2000, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on January 18, 2000. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray,
806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35(4th Cir. 1986).
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished