Jones v. Conroy
Jones v. Conroy
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6934
NICHOLAS WARNER JONES, a/k/a Charles Jones,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PATRICK CONROY, Warden; THOMAS P. CORCORAN, Former Warden; CHARLES H. SMITH, Assistant Warden; SAMUEL HAWKINS, Security Chief; LEHR- MAN DOTSON, Assistant Warden; MAURICE VICE, C.O.I.; DAVID BARRELL; COREY BROWN; DARNELL DUNSTON, Each above defendant is sued in their official and individual capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 00-7182
NICHOLAS WARNER JONES, a/k/a Charles Jones,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PATRICK CONROY, Warden; JOHN JOSEPH CURRAN, JR.; WILLIAM W. SONDERVAN; ANGELO LEE, Lieu- tenant; LARRY TROY, Captain; SHARON MARTIN, Officer; A. SMITH, Officer,
Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-00- 1728-L, CA-00-645-L)
Submitted: October 12, 2000 Decided: October 20, 2000
Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nicholas Warner Jones, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
2 PER CURIAM:
Nicholas Warner Jones appeals the district court’s order deny-
ing relief on his
42 U.S.C.A. § 1983(West Supp. 2000) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See Jones v. Conroy,No. CA-00-1728-L (D.
Md. June 28, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished