U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Funderburk v. Conley

Funderburk v. Conley
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 20, 2000

Funderburk v. Conley

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6789

LANDON MORRIS FUNDERBURK, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

JOYCE K. CONLEY, Warden, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Beckley. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (CA-00-256-5)

Submitted: October 10, 2000 Decided: October 20, 2000

Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Landon Morris Funderburk, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Landon Morris Funderburk, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Funderburk v. Conley, No. CA-00-256-5 (S.D. W. Va. May 26, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.