Coleman v. Woodard

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Coleman v. Woodard

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6744

HENRY DONALD COLEMAN, JR., a/k/a Henry Muhammad,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

G. L. WOODARD; H. E. WEBSTER; CAPTAIN JONES; CHAPLIN SHERMAN; FRAN MINSHEW; MARSHALL PIKE; SERGEANT BATTS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-113-5-BO)

Submitted: October 12, 2000 Decided: October 20, 2000

Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry Donald Coleman, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Henry Donald Coleman, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West Supp. 2000) com-

plaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. See Coleman v. Woodard, No. CA-

00-113-5-BO (E.D.N.C. May 3, 2000). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished