United States v. Anderson
United States v. Anderson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6567
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
PAMELA J. ANDERSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CR-96-95)
Submitted: August 29, 2000 Decided: October 19, 2000
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pamela J. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. John Phillip Ellington, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Pamela J. Anderson appeals the district court’s order denying
her motion to suspend imposition of sentence. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See United States v. Anderson, No. CR-96-95 (E.D. Va. Apr.
4, 2000).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Although the district court’s judgment or order is marked as “filed” on April 3, 2000, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on April 4, 2000. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the judgment or order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray,
806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35(4th Cir. 1986).
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished