Childress v. Elmer Childress Trucking

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Childress v. Elmer Childress Trucking

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1669

ELMER F. CHILDRESS,

Petitioner,

versus

ELMER CHILDRESS TRUCKING COMPANY; LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (99-414-BLA)

Submitted: September 29, 2000 Decided: October 19, 2000

Before TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elmer F. Childress, Petitioner Pro Se. John Chadwick Johnson, FRITH, ANDERSON & PEAKE, Roanoke, Virginia; Patricia May Nece, Barry H. Joyner, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Elmer F. Childress seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s

decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial

of black lung benefits pursuant to

30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945

(West

1986 & Supp. 2000). Our review of the record discloses that the

Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

Board. See Childress v. Elmer Childress Trucking Co., BRB No. 99-

414-BLA (B.R.B. Apr. 13, 2000). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished