Childress v. Elmer Childress Trucking
Childress v. Elmer Childress Trucking
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1669
ELMER F. CHILDRESS,
Petitioner,
versus
ELMER CHILDRESS TRUCKING COMPANY; LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (99-414-BLA)
Submitted: September 29, 2000 Decided: October 19, 2000
Before TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elmer F. Childress, Petitioner Pro Se. John Chadwick Johnson, FRITH, ANDERSON & PEAKE, Roanoke, Virginia; Patricia May Nece, Barry H. Joyner, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Elmer F. Childress seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s
decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial
of black lung benefits pursuant to
30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945(West
1986 & Supp. 2000). Our review of the record discloses that the
Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
Board. See Childress v. Elmer Childress Trucking Co., BRB No. 99-
414-BLA (B.R.B. Apr. 13, 2000). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished