Melvin v. Kelly-Springfield

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Melvin v. Kelly-Springfield

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1783

FREDERICK E. MELVIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THE KELLY SPRINGFIELD TIRE CORPORATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief Dis- trict Judge. (CA-99-599-5-BO)

Submitted: October 12, 2000 Decided: October 18, 2000

Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frederick E. Melvin, Appellant Pro Se. Richard M. Wiggins, MCCOY, WEAVER, WIGGINS, CLEVELAND & RAPER, Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Frederick E. Melvin appeals the district court’s order grant-

ing the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on his employment

discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and the dis-

trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Melvin v.

Kelly Springfield Tire Corp., No. CA-99-599-5-BO (E.D.N.C. May 5,

2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished