Bupp v. Henderson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Bupp v. Henderson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1767

DAVID L. BUPP,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM J. HENDERSON, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-99-553-2)

Submitted: October 12, 2000 Decided: October 18, 2000

Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David L. Bupp, Appellant Pro Se. Kent Pendleton Porter, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

David L. Bupp appeals the district court’s order granting De-

fendant’s motion for summary judgment in Bupp’s employment discrim-

ination action alleging racial and sexual discrimination, and

retaliation. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See Bupp v. Henderson, No. CA-99-553-2

(E.D. Va. Apr. 12, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished