Scott v. Shalala, Sec
Scott v. Shalala, Sec
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1259
BETTINA M. SCOTT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DONNA E. SHALALA, SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA- 99-2230-S)
Submitted: August 7, 2000 Decided: October 17, 2000
Before WIDENER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David H. Shapiro, Diane Duhig, SWICK & SHAPIRO, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Lynne A. Battaglia, United States Attorney, James M. Webster, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Bettina M. Scott appeals from the entry of summary judgment in
favor of the Defendant in this employment discrimination action
against the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Adminis-
tration (“SAMHSA”). We have reviewed the record and the district’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Scott v. Shalala, No. CA-
99-2230-S (D. Md. Dec. 21, 1999). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished