United States v. Oxendine
United States v. Oxendine
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7027
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
HORACE OXENDINE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CR-89-16-BR)
Submitted: October 20, 2000 Decided: November 3, 2000
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Horance Oxendine, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assis- tant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Horace Oxendine appeals a district court’s margin order deny-
ing his motion to correct illegal sentence. The record reflects
that Oxendine has previously filed several motions pursuant to
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West Supp. 2000) and that he has not obtained au-
thorization from this Court to file a successive motion as required
by
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West Supp. 2000). Because Oxendine cannot
circumvent this requirement by filing what is best construed as a
habeas petition under another name, we affirm the district court’s
order denying the motion.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished