United States v. Oxendine
United States v. Oxendine
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7027
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
HORACE OXENDINE, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CR-89-16-BR)
Submitted: October 20, 2000 Decided: November 3, 2000
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Horance Oxendine, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assis- tant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Horace Oxendine appeals a district court’s margin order deny- ing his motion to correct illegal sentence. The record reflects that Oxendine has previously filed several motions pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000) and that he has not obtained au- thorization from this Court to file a successive motion as required by 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). Because Oxendine cannot circumvent this requirement by filing what is best construed as a habeas petition under another name, we affirm the district court’s order denying the motion.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.