Coley v. Garraghty
Coley v. Garraghty
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6965
TODD K. COLEY, a/k/a Kenyo Blackmon,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
DAVID A. GARRAGHTY,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-00-167-7)
Submitted: October 26, 2000 Decided: November 2, 2000
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Todd K. Coley, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., As- sistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Todd K. Coley seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying relief on his petition filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West
1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the
reasoning of the district court. See Coley v. Garraghty, No. CA-
00-167-7 (W.D. Va. filed June 20, 2000; entered June 21, 2000). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished