U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Coley v. Garraghty

Coley v. Garraghty
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 2, 2000

Coley v. Garraghty

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6965

TODD K. COLEY, a/k/a Kenyo Blackmon, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

DAVID A. GARRAGHTY, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-00-167-7)

Submitted: October 26, 2000 Decided: November 2, 2000

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Todd K. Coley, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., As- sistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Todd K. Coley seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Coley v. Garraghty, No. CA- 00-167-7 (W.D. Va. filed June 20, 2000; entered June 21, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.