Turner v. US Dept Agriculture
Turner v. US Dept Agriculture
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2248
JOHN PAUL TURNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE; VIRGINIA STATE POLICE; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SER- VICES; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (MISC-00-37-7)
Submitted: October 26, 2000 Decided: November 1, 2000
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
John Paul Turner appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The district
court denied the motion because Turner failed to comply with the
terms of a prefiling injunction. We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accord-
ingly, we deny the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis
and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See
Turner v. United States Dep’t of Agric., No. MISC-00-37-7 (W.D. Va.
Sept. 15, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished