Csoka v. United States
Csoka v. United States
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1628
LOUIS A. CSOKA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT; RUDY LOZANO; JAMES T. MOODY; ALLEN SHARP, and the above Federal Judges; AMOCO OIL COMPANY, its management-- Richard J. McGillivary, Jack Graham, Ralph Phillip, Michael VanAcker, Michael A. Doerner, Eric Weck, Vyt Lazauskas aka BP Amoco; UNKS; H. NASIF MAHMOUD, Attorney; WILLIAM H. WALDEN, Deputy Prosecutor/Attorney; CHARLES H. GRAD- DICK, City Judge/Attorney; JOEL C. LEVY; STEVEN R. CRIST; PALMER C. SINGLETON, JR.; R. CORDELL FUNK; NELS KOMPIER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-00- 873-L)
Submitted: October 26, 2000 Decided: November 1, 2000
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Louis A. Csoka, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Louis A. Csoka appeals from the district court’s order dis-
missing his civil action and transferring the case to the United
States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. Our
review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Csoka’s motions for ap-
pointed counsel, for a directed verdict, for a mandatory injunc-
tion, and to correct omission, and affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Csoka v. United States, No. CA-00-873-L (D.
Md. Apr. 11, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished