Phillips v. US Parole Comm
Phillips v. US Parole Comm
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6875
ANDRE PHILLIPS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA- 00-1236-S)
Submitted: October 31, 2000 Decided: November 17, 2000
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andre Phillips, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United States Attorney, Ariana Wright Arnold, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Andre Phillips appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Phillips v. United States Parole Comm’n, No. CA-00- 1236-S (D. Md. June 13, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.