U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

United States v. Bramwell

United States v. Bramwell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 16, 2000

United States v. Bramwell

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7057

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

MARLON BRAMWELL, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-91-429-A)

Submitted: October 31, 2000 Decided: November 16, 2000

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marlon Bramwell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Marlon Bramwell appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Bramwell’s pending motion filed under Fed. R. App. P. 10(a) and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Bramwell, No. CR-91-429-A (E.D. Va. May 23, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.