King v. Ray
King v. Ray
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7149
GARY LOUIS KING,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
M. E. RAY, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-00-784)
Submitted: November 9, 2000 Decided: November 16, 2000
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gary Louis King, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Gary Louis King appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his
28 U.S.C. § 2241(1994) petition. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recom-
mendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on
the reasoning of the district court. See King v. Ray, No. CA-00-
784 (D.S.C. Aug. 2, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished