U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2000

Fields v. Dalkon Shield Trust

Fields v. Dalkon Shield Trust
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 16, 2000

Fields v. Dalkon Shield Trust

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1158

In Re: A. H. ROBINS COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Debtor.

ELLEN PAULETTE M. FIELDS, Claimant - Appellant, versus

DALKON SHIELD CLAIMANTS TRUST, Trust - Appellee.

No. 00-2279

In Re: A. H. ROBINS COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Debtor.

ELLEN PAULETTE M. FIELDS, Claimant - Appellant, versus

DALKON SHIELD CLAIMANTS TRUST, Trust - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-85-1307-R)

Submitted: October 31, 2000 Decided: November 16, 2000

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ellen Paulette M. Fields, Appellant Pro Se. Orran Lee Brown, Sr., BOWMAN & BROOKE, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Ellen Paulette M. Fields appeals the district court’s orders dismissing these actions for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Fields v. Dalkon Shield Trust, No. CA-85-1307-R (E.D. Va. Jan. 27, 2000, Sept. 21, 2000). Fields’ motions for preparation of transcript at government expense and for payment of all damages are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.