United States v. Brown
United States v. Brown
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7254
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DOVON BROWN, a/k/a Capone,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-95-144-H, CA-99-672-H)
Submitted: November 9, 2000 Decided: November 15, 2000
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dovon Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Dovon Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying
his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West Supp. 2000). We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-
ability, deny Brown’s motion for judicial notice, and dismiss the
appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States
v. Brown, Nos. CR-95-144-H; CA-99-672-H (E.D.N.C. filed July 10;
entered July 11, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished